Cyber Threat Maturity Assessments

Understand your CTI capabilities. Build a roadmap to regulatory confidence.

Threat Intelligence Maturity Assessments

How mature is your threat intelligence function? What gaps exist before your next TLPT? Where should you invest to meet DORA’s continuous improvement expectations? Threat intelligence maturity assessments from Threat Insights evaluate your organistion’s CTI capabilities against industry-standard frameworks—CTI-CMM, CREST standards, and DORA Article 15 requirements. Through stakeholder interviews, process reviews, and technology stack evaluation, we assess your maturity across governance, intelligence operations, analytical capabilities, and technology enablement. You receive detailed findings, gap analysis against regulatory expectations, and a prioritized 12-18 month improvement roadmap with quick wins, strategic initiatives, and resource requirements. Whether you’re building a CTI function from the ground up or maturing existing capabilities, our assessments provide the clarity needed to justify investment and demonstrate progress to regulators.

Key Features

Framework based evaluation

We assess against recognized maturity models—CTI Capability Maturity Model (CTI-CMM) or CREST standards—ensuring credible, defensible evaluation rather than subjective opinions.

Regulatory Alignment

Every assessment explicitly maps your capabilities against DORA Article 15 requirements, identifying where you meet, partially meet, or don't meet regulatory expectations for threat intelligence.

Cross functional Input

We interview security operations, incident response, threat intelligence, risk management, and business stakeholders to understand capability from multiple perspectives and identify organisational friction points.

Technology Assessment

Evaluate how well your threat intelligence platforms, SIEM integrations, ticketing workflows, and analytical tools support effective CTI operations—identifying technical gaps and integration opportunities.

Inventory Roadmap

Receive a 12-18 month implementation plan organised by quick wins (0-3 months), capability building (3-9 months), and strategic initiatives (9-18 months)—with effort estimates and dependencies.

Benchmark Comparisons

Understand how your maturity compares to peer institutions in financial services, highlighting where you lead, where you lag, and what "good" looks like for your institution's size and complexity.

Get your ad-hoc threat advisor

Contact Contact Contact

Cyber Threat Maturity Assessments

"Prevention is cheaper than a breach"